« Is it time to consider a Web Application Firewall? | Main | Will Fake AV turn to legit names in force? »

Tuesday, 08 February 2011


Feed You can follow this conversation by subscribing to the comment feed for this post.

"Training NoScript may seem inconvenient for a while"

More like "extremely frustrating forever". Every time I've installed it, I've uninstalled it a few days later because it's impossible to get anything done. Stuff just doesn't work, and you reload the page and it still doesn't work. It really needs to be based on a huge whitelist, not just block every legit site in existence by default.

After reading your entry, I immediately installed NoScript. After two days of use, I am delighted with it. It's a real eye-opener to see how much goes on after one click. (I find that even just typing this, Typepad.com wants me to permit yahooapis, quantserve, and scorecardresearch.com.)

I was afraid this experience would be like asking to be prompted whenever a cookie is set -- totally unlivable. But the options of allowing scripts fully in domains you trust, allowing SOME scripts one-time use, and forbidding some scripts outright make this a nice blend of safety and livability. Thanks for the tip!

Verify your Comment

Previewing your Comment

This is only a preview. Your comment has not yet been posted.

Your comment could not be posted. Error type:
Your comment has been saved. Comments are moderated and will not appear until approved by the author. Post another comment

The letters and numbers you entered did not match the image. Please try again.

As a final step before posting your comment, enter the letters and numbers you see in the image below. This prevents automated programs from posting comments.

Having trouble reading this image? View an alternate.


Post a comment

Comments are moderated, and will not appear until the author has approved them.

Your Information

(Name is required. Email address will not be displayed with the comment.)

Find me on Mastodon and Facebook
My Photo